FivePageAudit

WCAG 2.2 AA · five pages

Find out exactly what is failing on five of your pages

Most accessibility reports are a scanner dump with a score on the front. This is the opposite: every issue reproduced in a real browser and reviewed before delivery, with the selector, the measurement, the fix and how long it will take.

  • £249one-time, no subscription
  • 5public pages, one domain
  • 3business days to deliver
Request the £249 review Get a free one-page scan

Start free if you would rather see the work first. There is no checkout on this site — if the review suits your business we send a payment link privately, by email.

Five Page Audit — finding 3 of 14 /pricing
SERIOUS 1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum) · AA

Button label fails minimum contrast

Selector
.plan-card > button.cta
Measured
2.3:1 against a required 4.5:1
Correction
Darken the label to #3d6f7d — 4.6:1 
.plan-card > button.cta {
- color: #8fb8c4;
+ color: #3d6f7d;
}
Reproduced in Chromium 1280×800 Effort: under 30 min

The deliverable

What a finding actually looks like

Every issue in your report is written like this. No score, no severity pie chart, nothing you have to interpret before you can act on it.

Illustrative example

This finding is invented to show the format. It is not taken from a customer report, and no customer name, URL or result appears anywhere on this site. We do not publish client work.

Finding 7 of 14 /signup
CRITICAL 2.1.1 Keyboard · Level A

Country selector cannot be reached by keyboard

Selector
div.select-shim
Measured
Tab order skips the control entirely: focus moves #postcode → #submit
Reproduce
Load /signup, click the first field, press Tab repeatedly. The selector never receives focus, so the form cannot be completed without a mouse.
Correction
Replace the shim with a native <select>. If the custom control must stay it needs role="combobox", arrow, Enter and Escape handlers, and a visible focus style.
Reproduced in Chromium 1280×800 Effort: 1–2 hours
Finding 11 of 14 /features
MODERATE 1.4.10 Reflow · Level AA

Comparison table forces sideways scrolling at 320 px

Selector
table.compare
Measured
Content is 712 px wide in a 320 px viewport
Correction
Wrap the table in a container with overflow-x:auto so the page itself stops scrolling, or restack the columns below 40 rem.
Reproduced at 320×800 Effort: under 1 hour

See how a full report is structured — same format, illustrative content.

What you receive

One report, written for whoever will do the fixing

Handed straight to a developer, it should need no translation.

01

Every issue, in full

The WCAG 2.2 criterion it fails, a severity, the page and element selector, steps to reproduce, a suggested fix and an effort estimate.

02

Only what we could reproduce

Every automated finding is re-tested in a real browser. Anything we cannot reproduce is discarded and never reaches your report.

03

The method, stated

Tool versions, test date, browser and viewport, which pages were tested and what was out of scope — so a developer can repeat the work and check us.

04

A plain summary

What is worst, what is cheapest to fix and what we would do first. For whoever is deciding, not typing.

How it works

Five steps, three business days

Nothing here is a black box. You can repeat any of it.

1

Agree the pages

Five public URLs on one domain. We suggest a spread — home, a listing, a form, checkout.

2

Automated pass

Twelve high-confidence checks decidable from the markup, run across all five pages.

3

Browser pass

Contrast, keyboard traversal, focus order and visibility, reflow at 320 px, text at 200%, target size.

4

Reproduce or discard

Every candidate finding is re-tested in the browser. Anything that will not reproduce is dropped.

5

Write and check

Each finding gets a fix and an effort estimate. Reports are quality-assured before release.

Free or paid

The free scan is real, and it is limited

It is not a teaser. It is also not the review, and we would rather say where the line is here than have you find out afterwards.

What each one covers
 Free scan£249 review
PagesOne pageFive pages, one domain
Automated checksYes — 12 checksYes
Browser-based testingNoContrast, keyboard, focus, reflow, resize, target size
Findings reproduced in a browserNoEvery one
Reproduction stepsNoYes
Suggested fix and effortNoYes
TurnaroundUsually same working dayThree business days
PriceFree, no obligation£249 one-time

Automated testing finds only a minority of accessibility barriers. A clean automated scan is not conformance and does not mean a site is accessible. The checks machines are reliable at are a small part of what makes a page usable — which is the whole reason the paid review adds a browser pass.

Fit

Is this review right for your business?

We would rather turn work away than sell you something that does not fit.

A good fit if

  • You have a public website with pages that matter commercially
  • Someone can act on the findings, in-house or an agency
  • You want specifics you can hand to a developer, not a score
  • Five representative pages would tell you something useful

Probably not yet if

  • Your site is mid-rebuild and about to change substantially
  • The pages you care about are behind a login — we test public pages only
  • You need a formal conformance statement or an audit for a legal filing
  • You want continuous monitoring rather than a point-in-time review

The review

One price, one scope, no upsell

And terms that apply whether or not you ask for them.

£249

one-time · five public pages on one domain
delivered within three business days

  • Automated testing and browser-based testing
  • Reproduced findings only — unreproducible results discarded
  • Severity and the WCAG 2.2 criterion for every finding
  • Steps to reproduce each issue yourself
  • A suggested fix and an effort estimate
  • Method, tool versions, browser and viewport stated

What we commit to

  • DeliveryWithin three business days of payment.
  • If we miss thatFull refund, issued by us without you having to ask.
  • If the review turns out not to suit youFull refund before any work starts.
  • If your site blocks testingWe tell you within one business day. Full refund if it cannot be resolved within two.
  • If we find nothing significantYou get the report saying so, with the evidence. That is a real result and it is not refunded.
Request the £249 review

Get started

Two ways in

Each opens its own short form, so what you are asking for is settled before you start typing rather than by a control halfway down a page.

Recommended

The five-page review

£249

Five pages, browser-verified findings, three business days. We ask four eligibility questions first — before any payment link exists, not after you have paid.

Request the £249 review

No charge

Free one-page scan

Free

Automated checks on a single page, usually back the same working day. No obligation, and nothing to answer beyond your name, email and the URL.

Get a free one-page scan

There is no checkout on this website. If the review suits your business we send a payment link privately, to you, by email.

Before you buy

Limitations, and what this is not

This is the part most likely to change your mind, which is why it is not in a footer.

  • Not legal advice, and not produced by a lawyer
  • Not a certification, and not a conformance statement
  • Not a guarantee of compliance, and not protection from enforcement
  • Not exhaustive — five sampled pages, at one point in time
  • Public pages only. Nothing behind a login, paywall or consent wall
  • One browser and viewport set, stated in the report
  • No assistive-technology user testing — that needs disabled people, paid properly, and is a different service
  • Findings are reproducible technical failures against stated criteria, not an opinion on usability

On regulation

The European Accessibility Act's service obligations generally do not apply to microenterprises — fewer than 10 staff and under €2 million turnover. If that is you, we will tell you plainly, and we will not sell you the review on a compliance argument that does not apply.

That is a point about the law, not about the value of the work. Accessibility barriers cost you customers whether or not a regulation names you: people who cannot complete a form do not buy, and they rarely complain first. Plenty of small businesses buy this review because they want the site to work, and that is a perfectly good reason.

How the work is produced

Testing and report drafting are performed by an AI agent (Claude), using automated tooling and a browser-driven verification pass. Findings that cannot be reproduced in a real browser are discarded before the report is written.

Antony Draper is the supplier of record and is accountable for the delivery, the quality and the accuracy of every report issued, and for refunds and complaints. Reports are quality-assured on a sampled basis before release. If a finding in your report is wrong, that is our responsibility to correct — tell us and we will re-test it and reissue.

Ready when you are

£249. Five pages. Three business days.

Every issue reproduced in a browser, with the selector, the measurement, the fix and the effort. Full refund if we miss the deadline, if the review turns out not to suit you, or if your site blocks testing and we cannot resolve it.

Request the £249 review Start with a free scan

No checkout on this site. A payment link is issued privately after the eligibility questions.

£249

one-time, no subscription

  • Five public pages on one domain
  • Automated and browser-based testing
  • Severity, WCAG criterion, selector
  • Reproduction steps and a suggested fix
  • Effort estimate for every finding
  • Delivered within three business days